tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5460788270738656369.post2934200068235898192..comments2023-12-24T07:02:43.274+08:00Comments on Catalogue of Organisms: Lace Web WeaversChristopher Taylorhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11075565866351612441noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5460788270738656369.post-82595517368313518312012-06-02T08:02:06.934+08:002012-06-02T08:02:06.934+08:00I think some of the taxa I referred to in the post...I think some of the taxa I referred to in the post on <a href="http://coo.fieldofscience.com/2009/09/taxon-of-week-amphinectidae.html" rel="nofollow">Amphinectidae</a> are still yet to be tested phylogenetically, so we may not have seen the last of family reshuffles among the old (by which I mean pre-1990s) amaurobioids.Christopher Taylorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11075565866351612441noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5460788270738656369.post-1773323560266333162012-06-01T15:02:27.779+08:002012-06-01T15:02:27.779+08:00Thank you for the fascinating post! You mention a ...Thank you for the fascinating post! You mention a "collapse" of the amaurobioids. Coddington was still defining them in 2005, in Spiders of North America (Ubick et al.), though he placed this family separate from them. Have the amaurobioids further collapsed since 2005, or is the current clade just the current remainder of a collapse in progress? Thanks!Joe Lapphttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08913058019430933480noreply@blogger.com