tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5460788270738656369.post4308063856735752779..comments2023-12-24T07:02:43.274+08:00Comments on Catalogue of Organisms: Two New Insect Orders?Christopher Taylorhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11075565866351612441noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5460788270738656369.post-66562775382269240062017-03-07T21:05:05.506+11:002017-03-07T21:05:05.506+11:00I think 'jizz' is originally a birdwatchin...I think 'jizz' is originally a birdwatching term. It comes from the acronym for 'General Impression and Shape'.Christopher Taylorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11075565866351612441noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5460788270738656369.post-83863712326264632632017-03-07T05:50:06.732+11:002017-03-07T05:50:06.732+11:00"The overall 'jizz' of Aethiocarenus...."The overall 'jizz' of Aethiocarenus..."<br /><br />That word clearly means something to you very different from what it means to me.Mike Keeseyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00147156174467903264noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5460788270738656369.post-14260876034749054982017-03-05T09:03:44.617+11:002017-03-05T09:03:44.617+11:00Sandgropers are related to the Tridactylidae, the ...Sandgropers are related to the Tridactylidae, the pygmy mole crickets, but as it happens the two are not very closely related to the true mole crickets. Mole crickets are proper crickets, but tridactyloids actually belong to the short-horned grasshopper lineage.Christopher Taylorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11075565866351612441noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5460788270738656369.post-76478974545021084832017-03-04T23:56:39.477+11:002017-03-04T23:56:39.477+11:00Interesting post. Of course monophyletic orders w...Interesting post. Of course monophyletic orders will break down if we start looking at stem taxa, unless you want an awful lot of them. I had no idea sandgropers existed. Are they derivatives of mole crickets?Mickey Mortimerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08831823442911513851noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5460788270738656369.post-22320170254637621542017-03-04T07:33:15.628+11:002017-03-04T07:33:15.628+11:00if you're confused about the date, it reflects...<i>if you're confused about the date, it reflects the difference between the online and print publication</i><br />In short, the print publication lied, as they so often do. I cite such cases (like two of my papers so far) as "2016" in the text (as you did in the caption) and as "2016 (printed 2017)" in the references list.David Marjanovićnoreply@blogger.com