tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5460788270738656369.post8632357383367167229..comments2023-12-24T07:02:43.274+08:00Comments on Catalogue of Organisms: Dinosaurs All Over the PlaceChristopher Taylorhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11075565866351612441noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5460788270738656369.post-36240374530515765322010-04-03T15:22:05.737+08:002010-04-03T15:22:05.737+08:00Man, another fake citation for people to ask me fo...Man, another fake citation for people to ask me for years down the line (as happens with one of Marjanovic's April Fools jokes from a while back).... ;)Mickey Mortimerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08831823442911513851noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5460788270738656369.post-31312690351233080292010-04-01T19:29:37.612+08:002010-04-01T19:29:37.612+08:00Lars, I bow before your thoroughness.Lars, I bow before your thoroughness.Christopher Taylorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11075565866351612441noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5460788270738656369.post-44213420852561410002010-04-01T18:36:46.092+08:002010-04-01T18:36:46.092+08:00It's a pity they didn't include any mammal...It's a pity they didn't include any mammals in their analysis (other than that opossum). I've done so, and found that Wagler was right in 1830 that monotremes are also part of Gryphi. Ameghino's (1906) Homalodonta hypothesis is partly confirmed in that cetaceans are sister to monotremes, which are therefore also secondarily terrestrial. Both are sister to ichthyosaurs. However, xenarthrans are derived ornithischians, as suggested by Steinmann (1909). Also, my inclusion of even more taxa somehow pulled Aves+Rhynchosauria+Chelonia insde Therapsida, sister to Dicynodontia. So the beaked clade Rhamphosauria Haeckel (1866) is recovered, as is Haematothermia, with turtles obviously being secondarily ectothermic. The find of a hairy Triassic fossil turtle (Hokes & Poisson, in press) confirms this.Lars Dietznoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5460788270738656369.post-25697715882991154162010-04-01T15:41:58.644+08:002010-04-01T15:41:58.644+08:00Beautiful.
(Now, what would be perfect were if so...Beautiful.<br /><br />(Now, what would be <i>perfect</i> were if some creationist now cited this post as proof that scientists change their story all the time.)Andreas Johanssonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08802392912541974977noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5460788270738656369.post-8279389119479895672010-04-01T14:28:19.422+08:002010-04-01T14:28:19.422+08:00Transactions of the Royal Society of Hull
That...<i>Transactions of the Royal Society of Hull</i><br /><br />That's one of my favourite journals.Dartiannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5460788270738656369.post-44242511165699040172010-04-01T14:11:13.511+08:002010-04-01T14:11:13.511+08:00Nice one!Nice one!Juliahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04695173188736074202noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5460788270738656369.post-56769891102298748682010-04-01T13:35:56.026+08:002010-04-01T13:35:56.026+08:00Excellent attempt. ;)Excellent attempt. ;)Mike Keeseyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00147156174467903264noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5460788270738656369.post-19525669346230207512010-04-01T13:31:50.332+08:002010-04-01T13:31:50.332+08:00Hmmm, methinks you have the citation wrong. Its n...Hmmm, methinks you have the citation wrong. Its not Parera et al 2010, rather it should be Peters et al. 2010. ;)220myahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06403919493457640549noreply@blogger.com