Field of Science

  • in The Phytophactor
  • in The Large Picture Blog
  • in Sex, Genes & Evolution
  • in Field Notes
  • in Genomics, Medicine, and Pseudoscience
  • in Catalogue of Organisms
  • in Labs
  • in Angry by Choice
  • in The Biology Files
  • in Doc Madhattan
  • in The Curious Wavefunction
  • in Protein Evolution and Other Musings
  • in A is for Aspirin
  • in The Astronomist
  • in inkfish
  • in The View from a Microbiologist
  • in Rule of 6ix
  • in RRResearch
  • in Pleiotropy
  • in Variety of Life
  • in PLEKTIX
  • in The Culture of Chemistry
  • in Life of a Lab Rat
  • in C6-H12-O6
  • in The Greenhouse
  • in Chinleana
  • in History of Geology
  • in Moss Plants and More
  • in Skeptic Wonder
  • in Games with Words
  • in Memoirs of a Defective Brain
  • in Disease Prone

Name the Bug Revived

It's been a very long time since I last did one of these, and I'm not sure if I still have the readership for it, but I'm genuinely interested to know what anyone can make of this (attribution to follow):


Some necessary context: they're fossils, Cambrian in age, I presume being examined in thin section. The specimens numbered 1, 2 and 3 were described as three different species of a single genus. Even if you don't know exactly what it is, let me know what you think it might be...

Edit: Forgot to give an indicator of size. They're about the one-centimetre range in maximum breadth.

4 comments:

  1. You certainly jumped straight into the deep end with this one, I did my honours on cambrian problematica and I have little idea what these are. Large acritarchs?

    ReplyDelete
  2. OK I now see the edit, too big to be acritarchs...

    ReplyDelete
  3. Firstly, Adam, is there anything you haven't worked on at some point? Secondly, the follow-on post is now up here.

    ReplyDelete

Markup Key:
- <b>bold</b> = bold
- <i>italic</i> = italic
- <a href="http://www.fieldofscience.com/">FoS</a> = FoS