*If you want a more concrete example, an ecological survey being conducted by colleagues of mine has so far collected tens of thousands of specimens - including about three strepsipterans.
Strepsiptera are endoparasites of other insects. The name means 'twisted wing', and you may also find them being called stylops*. Both sexes are parasitic as larvae, and after pupating the winged males leave the host in search of females (the picture above, from Tree of Life, shows a male Pseudoxenos leaving its wasp host. Ick). Mature males never feed, and may only survive for a few hours. The females, except for one primitive family, never leave the host, but remain in a larva-like form.
*By the way, 'stylops' is both the singular and the plural.
In the extremely unlikely event of ever seeing a strepsipteran, you can rest assured that they cannot be easily mistaken for anything else. The picture above comes from here, and shows a generalised strepsipteran male. Strepsiptera have only one pair of functional wings, with the front pair reduced to balancing organs called halteres. The only other insect order to possess halteres are Diptera (flies), but in Diptera it is the hind pair that has been altered (more on that later). The antennae are branched and antler-like. The so-called 'raspberry eye' of Strepsiptera is actually unique in the insect world, with many disjoint ocelli. It can be seen better in the photo below of Caenocholax fenyesi (by Steve Taylor, from here).
The larvae are produced viviparously by the female, and emerge from the host in large numbers (so maybe there is a use for the collective noun, after all). The first instar larvae (known as triungulins) are surprisingly advanced, with well-developed eyes and legs in order to seek out a new host. Once they have found a host and burrowed in, however, all these mod-cons are jettisoned, leaving the larva legless and grub-like. The presence of such distinct larval stages is referred to as hypermetamorphosis. At least one strepsipteran family, the Myrmecolacidae, has particularly unusual host preferences - the males are parasites of ants, while the females favour grasshopppers and crickets (Kathrithamby et al., 2003). I have not been able to find whether the sex of the larva determines the host, or whether the host determines the sex.
Phylogenetically, the Strepsiptera are arguably the second most difficult insect order - probably, only the Zoraptera can claim to have caused more problems. Still, there are two main competitors for the position of nearest strepsipteran relative. For a long time, the Strepsiptera were associated with the beetles, to the extent that some authors even suggested reducing them to a subgroup of the Coleoptera. This was mainly predicated on similarities between the triungulin larvae of Strepsiptera and certain Coleoptera families, some of which shared the Strepsiptera's branched antennae and hypermetamorphosis. However, these features are also found in other unrelated insect groups, and the chance of convergence cannot be dismissed. Molecular analyses, on the other hand, suggested a relationship between Strepsiptera and Diptera, leading to the radical suggestion by Whiting & Wheeler (1994) that the strepsipteran halteres might actually be homologous to those of Diptera, and their difference in position might be due to a homoeotic reversal switching the identities of the wing pairs! At present, it is difficult to imagine how such a thing could have happened without fatally scrambling the rest of the insect's anatomy in that area, and even if they are sister groups, the Strepsiptera and Diptera may have still evolved their respective halteres independently.
And why should a collection of Strepsiptera be called a 'queenage'? It should be noted that parasitism by Strepsiptera (known as stylopisation), despite the inherent ickiness of having a grub-like parasite protruding from your abdomen, is rarely fatal, and males and larvae can emerge without harming the host. Indeed, stylopised hosts may live longer than they would normally. However, stylopisation can have other significant consequences. Gonad development is reduced, and stylopised hosts may often be sterile. Stylopisation may also have a dramatic effect on secondary sexual characteristics of the host - stylopised individuals may lose their expected secondary sexual features and develop features characteristic of the other sex (Salt, 1927). Hughes et al. (2004) discovered that stylopised individuals of one species of wasp did not work in the colony as normal, but abandoned the colony and formed loose aggregations elsewhere.
Parasite-induced castration is not uncommon in invertebrates, and it is believed that it is advantageous for the parasite to sterilise its host because then time and energy that the host would otherwise waste on finding and winning a mate and producing offspring can instead be focused on feeding the host and hence the parasite (think about the behavioural differences between a neutered and entire cat). Colony desertion by stylopised wasps is probably also induced by the parasite (stylopised individuals were not driven away from the colony by uninfected individuals) as the chance of successful male emergence and mating was greater in the aggregations than within the nest, where healthy wasps would destroy any male strepsipterans they spotted.
REFERENCES
Hughes, D. P., J. Kathirithamby, S. Turillazzi & L Beani. 2004. Social wasps desert the colony and aggregate outside if parasitized: parasite manipulation? Behavioral Ecology 15 (6): 1037-1043.
Kathirithamby, J., L. D. Ross & J. C. Johnston. 2003. Masquerading as self? Endoparasitic Strepsiptera (Insecta) enclose themselves in host-derived epidermal bag. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 100 (13): 7655-7659.
Salt, G. 1927. The effects of stylopization on aculeate Hymenoptera. Journal of Experimental Zoology 48: 223-331.
Whiting, M. F., & W. C. Wheeler. 1994. Insect homeotic transformation. Nature 368: 696.
Strepsipterans fill me with some kind of innate, fascinated, Lovecraftian horror. They're just so ... weirgh.
ReplyDeleteThe larvae are produced viviparously by the female, and emerge from the host in large numbers (so maybe there is a use for the collective noun, after all).
That is exactly why I proposed "invasion" as the collective noun (as in — of the Body Snatchers).
Phylogenetically, the Strepsiptera are arguably the second most difficult insect order - probably, only the Zoraptera can claim to have caused more problems
Zoraptera are probably closest to webspinners, no? At the very least, it seems to me strepsipterans should tie with them (although I am very, very far from a specialist).
I have not been able to find whether the sex of the larva determines the host, or whether the host determines the sex.
Sounds like a degree in the making for somebody.
Indeed, stylopised hosts may live longer than they would normally.
Now that is a fascinating idea.
Zoraptera are probably closest to webspinners, no?
ReplyDeleteWouldn't bet on it. Zoraptera have a reduced morphology that makes identifying similarities with any other order difficult. Grimaldi & Engel place them closest to webspinners. Terry & Whiting paired them with earwigs. Other authors prefer a relationship to Dictyoptera (cockroaches, mantids and termites). Hennig linked them to the Paraneoptera (the hemipteroid insects). The Russian school even regards Zoraptera as the relictual sister to the Holometabola. Most likely zorapterans are polyneopterans of some kind, but I wouldn't want to commit myself to saying just what kind.
And as for longer lifespans of parasitised hosts, my guess would be that it's another effect of lower reproductive stress and probable higher feeding rates.
Okay, that is just beyond wierd. How do the males mate with the females, if the females are within a host insect? Also, are there any other insects which go from insectoid larva to grub-like adult? To me, that's the strangest part.
ReplyDeleteOne end of the female protrudes from between the sclerites of the abdomen, giving the male all the access he needs.
ReplyDeleteWhat are the chances of Honeybee Hive Decline being caused by stylopization? Some of the symptoms appear similar, i.e. hive abandonment.
ReplyDeleteThere's a big difference between "rare" and "rarely placed in collections".
ReplyDeleteStrepsiptera are common on many widespread host species. I've reared them from Polistes (paper wasps), and often seen them on the Great Golden Digger Wasp - Sphex ichneumoneus.
It is rare to catch males flying or in traps. But like many "rare" things, that's an artifact of collecting methods.
There are Hymenoptera with triungulin (or planidia) larvae as well: notably the Perilampidae.
It's quite common to find hosts with multiple Strepsiptera jutting out of the abdomen, either male pupae or females, or both. So there is a place for a collective noun. Perhaps they should be an "exclamation of stylops". Or a "protrusion of stylops". Or a "bizarre of stylops".
Al: I know nothing of the honeybee problem I've heard is happening in America, but at a guess I would say that stylopisation is usually fairly obvious, with the parasite readily visible protruding from the host abdomen. As a result, I would guess that stylopisation of bees would be easily checked for.
ReplyDeleteMike: Thanks for the correction. And yes, it is the presence of hypermetamorphosis in other insect groups that causes problems for supporting a beetle-strepsipteran connection. It seems to be a reasonably common adaptation for parasitic larvae to find a suitable host.
regarding the design of the Stylops eye - there'a a clade of trilobites with the same remarkable design.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.trilobites.info/eyes.htm
In Oregon we refer to two or more (or, actually, fewer) blackberry bushes as "a problem". Expressed characteristically, "I see you've got a blackberry problem". It's rare to encounter the plural without the collective. The expression serves as a phatic statement of solidarity between landowners: because you own land, you have a blackberry problem, as do I.
ReplyDeleteBotanically, the problem species is Himalayan blackberry, more aggressive than the native varieties, which are being crowded out. The Himalayan has larger, juicier berries, but with less interesting flavor. Derived cultivars (loganberry, marionberry, boysenberry) get their flavor from the native variety.
Someday I may write a post on the taxonomy of blackberries. Most references list them as the Rubus fruticosus aggregate, where "aggregate" is a technical term for "Oh. God. No way am I touching that lot." There are apparently over 2000 available names for members of this group.
ReplyDelete