This week's highlight taxon (sorry it's a little late, my partner's been sick) is the Rhynchonellata. Rhynchonellata are one of the major clades of the brachiopods, marine animals that look rather like bivalves (clams, mussels, etc.) on the outside, but completely different on the inside. Textbooks will usually tell you that brachiopods are commonly known as "lamp shells" (supposedly because the shell of some species bears a vague resemblance to an archaic lamp), but I can't say as I know if anyone actually
uses that name. Rather, as with bryozoans supposedly being "moss animals", this seems to be a name promulgated in textbooks only. Anybody actually interested enough to discover the existence of brachiopods is usually interested enough to not be too scared by technical terminology to refer to brachiopods as anything other than "brachiopods". Living brachiopods are few and far between (Prothero, 1998, gives the figure of less than 120 living genera - the photo at the top of this post from
Treasures of the Sea shows a cluster of one example,
Liothyrella neozelanica) but were one of the dominant life-forms in the Palaeozoic. I must confess ignorance (but a fair amount of curiosity) as to exactly why brachiopods failed to hold onto their position of dominance. Successive mass extinctions (particularly the major die-off at the end of the Permian) seem to have decimated the brachiopods. Perhaps the main clue lies not in the failure of the brachiopods, but in the success of the bivalves - during the Palaeozoic, brachiopods excluded bivalves from all but the more marginal habitats, but bivalves sailed through the end-Permian event relatively unaffected, seemingly to claim the niches the brachiopods had left vacant before the brachiopods were able to reclaim their territory.
The diagram above (from
Palaeos) shows the internal anatomy of a brachiopod, and just how different it is from a bivalve. Notably, while the two shells of a bivalve are actually on the left and right side of the animal, the shells of a brachiopod are actually dorsal and ventral. Many brachiopods are attached to the substrate by a pedicle, a fleshy stalk emerging from the back end of the shell through an opening called the delthyrium. The majority of the brachiopod's organs take up very little space in the shell, with most of the space being taken up by the lophophores, pinnate tentacle-like structures that are used to filter food particles out of the water. Because of the lophophore, brachiopods were previously regarded as forming a clade with bryozoans and phoronids (also possessing lophophore-type structures) called Lophophorata. Though the Lophophorata concept was accepted for a great many years, recent analyses have failed to support it. The lophophore in bryozoans is derived embryonically in a decidedly different manner from that of brachiopods and phoronids (Nielsen, 2002 - brachiopods and phoronids still form a clade, the Brachiozoa). Notably, the pterobranchs, a group of small sessile organisms undoubtedly belonging to the
deuterostomes, actually have a lophophore-type structure much more like the brachiozoan structure than the bryozoan structure is. Molecular and possibly palaeontological* data place brachiopods somewhere close to the molluscs and annelids, but exact relationships between the three are still unclear.
*Depending on whether the suggested relationship between the brachiopods and the Cambrian halkieriids (e.g. Holmer
et al., 2002) holds up.
Rhynchonellata are the major (and the only living) clade of the articulate brachiopods, distinguished from the paraphyletic
"inarticulate" brachiopods by the development of proper hinge with sockets and teeth holding together the valves (inarticulate brachiopods use muscles to hold the valves together). Rhynchonellates are distinguished from the Strophomenata, the other (extinct) clade of articulate brachiopods by the absence of a pseudodeltidium (an internal shell plate partially covering the delthyrium) and the presence of a pedicle emerging posteriorly through the delthyrium (Sutton
et al., 2005 - ummm, wouldn't these be plesiomorphic characters?
Palaeos lists characters of the articulation supporting Rhynchonellata, but unfortunately the source sites linked to appear to be no longer available).
The majority of living rhynchonellates belong to the Terebratulida, including
Liothyrella. The Palaeozoic rhynchonellates, of course, showed a much greater diversity, with some eight or so orders (one small living order, the Thecideida, didn't actually appear until during the Mesozoic). One extinct order, the Spiriferida, actually survived the end-Permian event and even made something of a go of it in the Triassic, not fizzing out until sometime in the Jurassic. Spiriferids are probably my favourite group in the brachiopods, going in for a decidedly baroque turn in presentation. As shown in the picture of
Mucrospirifer above (from
Wikipedia), some spiriferids developed greatly elongated hinge lines, giving them a distinct winged appearance. It is possible that these "wings" supported the brachiopod on soft sediment, allowing the spiriferid to live floating on mud.
REFERENCES
Holmer, L. E., C. B. Skovsted & A. Williams. 2002. A stem group brachiopod from the Lower Cambrian: Support for a
Micrina (halkieriid) ancestry.
Palaeontology 45 (5): 875-882.
Nielsen, C. 2002. The phylogenetic position of Entoprocta, Ectoprocta, Phoronida, and Brachiopoda.
Integrative and Comparative Biology 42 (3): 685-691.
Prothero, D. R. 1998.
Bringing Fossils to Life: An introduction to paleobiology. WCB McGraw-Hill: Boston.
Sutton, M. D., D. E. G. Briggs, D. J. Siveter & D. J. Siveter. 2005. Silurian brachiopods with soft-tissue preservation.
Nature 436 (7053): 1013-1015.
Are brachiopods as delicious as bivalves?
ReplyDeleteInteresting stuff!
ReplyDeleteI bet we could think of some more invented vernacular names if we tried....
Are brachiopods as delicious as bivalves?
ReplyDeleteGorton's Law remains in place, I see. I don't think anyone, anywhere, has ever eaten brachiopods. Take another look at the anatomy diagram - there's just not an actual lot there to eat.
Come to think of it, I don't think I have ever seen a brachiopod, dead or alive. I would be interesting to see one using its lophophore.
ReplyDeleteI don't believe I've ever seen a live one, either. I've seen fossils, at least in my palaeontology classes. I believe the majority of living brachiopods are found in fairly deep water, though there are a few coastal species.
ReplyDeleteSo what are the closest living organisms today? Would that be bivalves?
ReplyDelete- Shelley, student
Brachiopods are still alive today, though not exceedingly abundant. They're not closely related to bivalves (or any other molluscs) at all.
ReplyDelete