(Okay, maybe it's not that difficult.) Attribution, as always, to follow.
Update: Identity available here. Figure from Kielan-Jaworowska (1971).
Field of Science
-
-
From Valley Forge to the Lab: Parallels between Washington's Maneuvers and Drug Development4 weeks ago in The Curious Wavefunction
-
Political pollsters are pretending they know what's happening. They don't.4 weeks ago in Genomics, Medicine, and Pseudoscience
-
-
Course Corrections5 months ago in Angry by Choice
Name the Bug # 54
The last few ID challenges have all been too easy, it seems. So what do all you clever buggers make of this one?
(Okay, maybe it's not that difficult.) Attribution, as always, to follow.
Update: Identity available here. Figure from Kielan-Jaworowska (1971).
(Okay, maybe it's not that difficult.) Attribution, as always, to follow.
Update: Identity available here. Figure from Kielan-Jaworowska (1971).
4 comments:
Markup Key:
- <b>bold</b> = bold
- <i>italic</i> = italic
- <a href="http://www.fieldofscience.com/">FoS</a> = FoS
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Obviously a mammal (presence of differentiated teeth and an alisphenoid bone amongst other features). The low multicusped teeth look like multituberculate teeth. Amongst multituberculates it looks a lot like Kryptobataar from the Cretaceous of Mongolia (single large reflected incisor, 6 postcanines)but the head shape doesn't seem quite right so I guess it may be a related form from the multituberculate group Cimolodonta.
ReplyDeleteOK got, it I was right, a cimolodont multituberculate but not Kryptobataar. Its Kamptobataar kuczynskii.
ReplyDeleteThree points, Adam. Which means that there are now two people needing only one more point to cross the line...
ReplyDeleteohmanohmanohman
ReplyDelete